Benchmark Investments Wins Delaware Court Judgment in ETF Contract Dispute With Pacer

19 August 2026 | Wednesday | News

Court ruling affirms Benchmark did not terminate its ETF Services Agreement and reinstates breach-of-contract claims as the case advances toward damages.
Picture Courtesy | Public Domain

Picture Courtesy | Public Domain

Benchmark Investments LLC  ("Benchmark"), an exchange-traded fund (ETF) sponsor and index provider, announces that the Superior Court of the State of Delaware has entered final judgment in its favor on remand in its contract dispute with Pacer Advisors, Inc. The Superior Court order declares that Benchmark did not terminate the parties' ETF Services Agreement, enters judgment in favor of Benchmark on Count I, and reinstates certain breach-of-contract claims previously dismissed under Count II. The case will now proceed to address remaining claims and Benchmark's damages. Benchmark is most notably known for conceiving, creating, sponsoring, and providing the capital and proprietary index for the first data center ETF.

The order implements the April 30, 2026, en banc decision of the Supreme Court of Delaware, which unanimously reversed the lower court's earlier ruling and directed entry of summary judgment for Benchmark on Count I of the Amended Complaint. The Court held: "The Agreement does not authorize Pacer to essentially 'fire' Benchmark and continue hosting the Funds without liquidating and without paying Benchmark." The Funds referenced by the Court are the SRVR and INDS ETFs, which Benchmark grew to over $2.1 billion in assets before Pacer's wrongful termination. Writing for a unanimous en banc Court, the Chief Justice held that a notice of intent to terminate is not the same as an actual termination, and that the Agreement unambiguously permitted Benchmark to propose a reorganization of the ETFs without causing a present termination.

The dispute arose from a white-label ETF arrangement under which Benchmark, as index provider and economic sponsor, paid Pacer to host and service funds tracking Benchmark's proprietary indexes. Benchmark retained exclusive control over the funds and indexes including the contractual right to terminate the relationship. Benchmark sued to enforce its contractual rights after Pacer purported to "accept" a notice of intent to terminate (pending a reorganization) and switched the ETFs to a competing index provider.

Survey Box

Vote for the most influential trend in 2025:

What's Driving the Future of FinTech?v

× Please select an option to participate in the poll.
Processing...
× You have successfully cast your vote.
 {{ optionDetail.option }}  {{ optionDetail.percentage }}%
 {{ optionDetail.percentage }}% Complete
More polls
Stay Connected

Sign up to our free newsletter and get the latest news sent direct to your inbox

Fintech Business Asia, a business of FinTech Business Review
© 2026 FinTech Business Review. All Rights Reserved.

Show

Forgot your password?

Show

Show

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link to create a new password.

Back to log-in

Close